Sustainability is vital for a healthier planet and ensuring future generations inherit a thriving world through responsible resource management and social equity. However, fraud threatens the effectiveness of green initiatives and public trust. Business leaders, auditors, educators, and policymakers must address this challenge. This piece by Dr Rasha Kassem explores the relationship between sustainability and fraud and how to tackle this issue for a sustainable future.
The Sustainability Integrity Challenge: Fighting Fraud for Genuine Impact
How Fraud Undermines Sustainability Initiatives
Fraud, as defined by social scientists, is a serious crime marked by deceitful intent for personal gain. It encompasses a range of unethical behaviours, including manipulation, theft, and the falsification or concealment of facts. The impacts of fraud extend beyond mere financial loss, profoundly affecting individuals and organisations alike. Fraud poses a threat not only to individual victims and organisations but also to the fabric of society as a whole, fostering an environment of scepticism and insecurity.
In the context of sustainability, fraud undermines initiatives in several critical ways. It erodes trust among stakeholders, misallocates resources away from legitimate projects, and leads to data manipulation, resulting in misguided policies. Furthermore, organisations involved in fraudulent activities often face reputational damage that deters partners and investors, halting sustainability efforts. Regulatory scrutiny may also distract them from their goals. When fraudulent claims are exposed, it fosters scepticism about all sustainability efforts, discouraging genuine participation and disproportionately affecting vulnerable communities, thus exacerbating social inequities.
Fraud in the context of sustainability can manifest in various ways, such as greenwashing, where companies falsely advertise their products or practices as environmentally friendly to attract consumers and investors. This deceptive behaviour not only misleads stakeholders but also dilutes the credibility of legitimate sustainability efforts. When fraud is exposed, it can lead to widespread scepticism about all eco-friendly claims, making it harder for genuine initiatives to gain traction. The interplay between eco-integrity and fraud also highlights the challenges of accountability and verification. While many organisations strive for eco-integrity, the lack of standardised metrics and rigorous oversight can create opportunities for manipulation. Moreover, the consequences of fraud extend beyond individual companies. They can erode public trust in regulatory bodies and sustainability initiatives, ultimately hindering progress toward broader environmental goals. A notable example is the Volkswagen emissions scandal, where the company misrepresented its diesel vehicles as environmentally friendly while manipulating emissions tests. This deceit not only misled consumers but also undermined trust in the entire automotive industry regarding environmental claims.
Similarly, despite presenting itself as a leader in digital payment solutions, Wirecard, a German FinTech Company, engaged in extensive fraudulent activities. The company falsely inflated its financial status by claiming to hold €1.9 billion in non-existent cash. This deception misled investors and stakeholders, undermining the credibility of various sustainability initiatives associated with Wirecard. While it positioned itself as a champion of digital transformation and responsible business practices, the exposure of its fraud led to a collapse of trust, not only in Wirecard but also throughout the broader fintech industry, fostering scepticism towards other companies genuinely committed to sustainability.
Both these examples serve as a stark reminder of how fraud can derail efforts to promote sustainability and environmental responsibility, highlighting the need for transparency and accountability in corporate practices.
Crafting Strategies Against Fraud in Sustainability
To effectively tackle sustainability fraud, collaboration among policymakers, organisational leaders, educators, and auditors is essential.
Policymakers can enhance regulatory frameworks by establishing clear definitions and standards for sustainability claims and mandatory disclosures. Currently, the existence of multiple sustainability frameworks, like Integrated Reporting and ESG (Environmental, Social and Governance) criteria, leads to confusion for organisations and stakeholders. Each framework has distinct guidelines and metrics, creating inconsistencies in measuring and communicating sustainability. Organisations may struggle to align their goals with the right framework, resulting in overlapping efforts and inefficient resource use. For stakeholders—investors, consumers, and regulators—this diversity complicates the interpretation and comparison of sustainability reports, undermining trust and informed decision-making. Ultimately, the lack of standardisation hampers accountability and transparency, highlighting the need for the industry to harmonise these frameworks to enhance clarity and effectiveness in sustainability practices.
Implementing robust verification mechanisms, such as independent audits and certification programmes, will increase accuracy in reported sustainability practices. One effective approach is to mandate that external auditors provide a separate report specifically addressing the auditee’s sustainability initiatives. This mirrors the Sarbanes-Oxley Act in the US, which requires auditors to evaluate and report on the effectiveness of internal controls. Such a requirement would enhance transparency and accountability in sustainability reporting.
Increasing transparency through public reporting and strengthening whistleblower protections can promote accountability. Education campaigns and company training on best sustainability practices are vital, as is collaboration with industry stakeholders to develop integrity standards. Regular monitoring and enforcement, including penalties for non-compliance, will deter dishonest practices. Supporting sustainable technologies and fostering international cooperation will further strengthen the global framework against sustainability fraud.
Organisational leaders must cultivate a culture prioritising integrity and transparency in sustainability practices. They should develop clear policies for sustainability reporting, ensuring all employees understand ethical practices. Leaders can equip staff to identify and report fraud by investing in training. Open communication with stakeholders enhances trust and credibility. Monitoring sustainability initiatives and advocating for transparent reporting are essential for upholding ethical practices and aligning with organisational values. Engaging with the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) through the Communication on Progress (CoP) report is a powerful way to demonstrate commitment. The CoP provides a platform for organisations to share their progress and strategies related to the SDGs, enhancing transparency and fostering collaboration. Organisations can inspire accountability and drive meaningful change in their sustainability practices by aligning with the SDGs and actively reporting their efforts.
Internal and external auditors play critical roles in maintaining the integrity of sustainability efforts. Internal auditors play a critical role in assessing risks, monitoring compliance, and evaluating the effectiveness of sustainability programmes, providing valuable recommendations for improvement. They identify weaknesses in internal controls, thereby strengthening accountability within the organisation. However, since internal audits are not legally mandated, some organisations may miss out on these benefits. Policymakers should consider making internal audits a requirement to enhance governance and support sustainable practices in the future.
External auditors are vital for independent assessments of sustainability reporting. Their evaluations ensure regulatory compliance and boost stakeholder confidence. They highlight best practices and areas for improvement, enhancing the credibility of sustainability efforts. However, audit firms must equip auditors with the training needed to assess sustainability initiatives effectively. Additionally, improving skills in detecting material fraud is essential for ensuring fairness in financial reporting. Addressing these challenges will strengthen support for organisations in achieving their sustainability goals while maintaining transparency and trust.
Educators in Higher Education can play a crucial role in shaping students’ understanding of sustainability, including the importance of fraud prevention. They should integrate sustainability concepts into the curriculum and foster critical thinking about sustainability claims. By mentoring students in research and projects, educators promote hands-on learning experiences. Facilitating workshops on sustainability fraud raises awareness and equips students with the tools necessary to address these challenges in their future careers. Collaborations with industry professionals provide valuable insights into best practices, inspiring the next generation of leaders committed to ethical sustainability.
One way to demonstrate commitment to these initiatives is by becoming signatories of the Principles for Responsible Management Education (PRME). The PRME mission is to inspire and champion responsible management education, research, and thought leadership globally. By aligning with PRME, institutions commit to integrating sustainability into their curricula and preparing students to contribute positively to society and the environment.
About the author
Dr Rasha Kassem is a Senior Lecturer in Accounting at Aston University. She has over 16 years of experience in Higher Education, specialising in research on fraud, corruption, cybercrime, governance, and audit across various sectors including private, public, and voluntary. Additionally, Rasha researches technology, sustainability, CSR, and pedagogy.
Image credit: Sean Pollock on Unsplash